On 08.03.21 15:11, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 08-03-21 14:22:12, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 08.03.21 13:49, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
Earlier in the discussion I have suggested dynamic debugging facility.
Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst. Have you tried to
look into that direction?

Did you see the previous mail this is based on:

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/yeeuq8zrn4wyy...@google.com

I agree that "nofail" is misleading. Rather something like
"dump_on_failure", just a better name :)

Yeah, I have read through the email thread. I just do not get why we
cannot make it pr_debug() and add -DDYNAMIC_DEBUG_MODULE for
page_alloc.c (I haven't checked whether that is possible for built in
compile units, maybe it is not but from a quick seems it should).

I really do not like this to be a part of the API. alloc_contig_range is

Which API? It does not affect alloc_contig_range() itself, it's used internally only. Sure, we could simply pr_debug() for each and every migration failure. As long as it's default-disabled, sure.

I do agree that we should look into properly including this into the dynamic debugging ifrastructure.

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to