On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:17 PM Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:59:34AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It works, but... The question here is why the script behaviour depends > > so much on the architecture in question (by environment). ARM stuff is > > using traditional ARCH (and that's what I have expected to work), > > while x86 has a set of other variables. > > So, I have to rephrase the commit message then and do actually an > > alias when ARCH is set in a certain way, Would it be better? > > No, I have no clue what you're trying to accomplish. You wanted to > supply ARCH when decoding a 32-bit oops because you expected ARCH to > work...?
Yes. > AFLAGS has always been there, ARM folks added ARCH AFAIR. Also, you need > AFLAGS to compile the snippet in the correct bitsize. > > And there's a usage note at the beginning of the script and I always > read it to make sure I'm using it right. > > So what's the problem again? Inconsistency. For the ARM we have to provide ARCH, for x86 a variety of all the flags. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
