On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 08:46:45AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2021, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> > @@ -3375,6 +3391,12 @@ enum nvmx_vmentry_status 
> > nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >     if (kvm_mpx_supported() &&
> >             !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS))
> >             vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs = vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS);
> > +   if (kvm_cet_supported() &&
> > +           !(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_CET_STATE)) {
> 
> Alignment.
> 
> > +           vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_ssp = vmcs_readl(GUEST_SSP);
> > +           vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_s_cet = vmcs_readl(GUEST_S_CET);
> > +           vmx->nested.vmcs01_guest_ssp_tbl = 
> > vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> > +   }
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * Overwrite vmcs01.GUEST_CR3 with L1's CR3 if EPT is disabled *and*
> > @@ -4001,6 +4023,9 @@ static bool is_vmcs12_ext_field(unsigned long field)
> >     case GUEST_IDTR_BASE:
> >     case GUEST_PENDING_DBG_EXCEPTIONS:
> >     case GUEST_BNDCFGS:
> > +   case GUEST_SSP:
> > +   case GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE:
> > +   case GUEST_S_CET:
> >             return true;
> >     default:
> >             break;
> > @@ -4052,6 +4077,11 @@ static void sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare(struct 
> > kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >             vmcs_readl(GUEST_PENDING_DBG_EXCEPTIONS);
> >     if (kvm_mpx_supported())
> >             vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs = vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS);
> > +   if (kvm_cet_supported()) {
> 
> Isn't the existing kvm_mpx_supported() check wrong in the sense that KVM only
> needs to sync to vmcs12 if KVM and the guest both support MPX?  

For MPX, if guest_cpuid_has() is not efficent, can it be checked by BNDCFGS EN 
bit?
E.g.:

if (kvm_mpx_supported() && (vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs & 1))

> Same would apply to CET. Not sure it'd be a net positive in terms of 
> performance since
> guest_cpuid_has() can be quite slow, but overwriting vmcs12 fields that 
> technically don't exist
> feels wrong.

For CET, can we get equivalent effect by checking vmcs12->guest_cr4.CET?
E.g.:
if (kvm_cet_supported() && (vmcs12->guest_cr4 & X86_CR4_CET))

> 
> > +           vmcs12->guest_ssp = vmcs_readl(GUEST_SSP);
> > +           vmcs12->guest_s_cet = vmcs_readl(GUEST_S_CET);
> > +           vmcs12->guest_ssp_tbl = vmcs_readl(GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE);
> > +   }
> >  
> >     vmx->nested.need_sync_vmcs02_to_vmcs12_rare = false;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > index 9d3a557949ac..36dc4fdb0909 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> > @@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ struct nested_vmx {
> >     /* to migrate it to L2 if VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS is off */
> >     u64 vmcs01_debugctl;
> >     u64 vmcs01_guest_bndcfgs;
> > +   u64 vmcs01_guest_ssp;
> > +   u64 vmcs01_guest_s_cet;
> > +   u64 vmcs01_guest_ssp_tbl;
> >  
> >     /* to migrate it to L1 if L2 writes to L1's CR8 directly */
> >     int l1_tpr_threshold;
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 

Reply via email to