* Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 03:17:04PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: > > + /* > > + * Choose the most efficient way to send an IPI. Note that the > > + * number of CPUs might be zero due to concurrent changes to the > > + * provided mask. > > + */ > > + if (nr_cpus == 1) > > + arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu); > > + else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1)) > > + arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi); > > I just ran into conflicts with another patch set, and noticed that the > above should probably be: > > if (nr_cpus == 1) > send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu); > else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1)) > arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi); > > Which will avoid the IPI when @last_cpu is idle. I turned this into the additional patch below, on top of Nadav's series. Thanks, Ingo ===============> From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 08:02:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] smp: Micro-optimize smp_call_function_many_cond() Call the generic send_call_function_single_ipi() function, which will avoid the IPI when @last_cpu is idle. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- kernel/smp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c index b6375d775e93..af0d51da84a2 100644 --- a/kernel/smp.c +++ b/kernel/smp.c @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask, * provided mask. */ if (nr_cpus == 1) - arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu); + send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu); else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1)) arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi); }