On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 00:41 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > > (There's also a specific issue with the gfp_mask limiting: I have > > > not yet reviewed the allowing and denying in detail, but it looks > > > like it does not respect the caller's GFP_ZONEMASK - the gfp in > > > shmem_getpage_gfp() and shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp() is there to > > > satisfy the gma500, which wanted to use shmem but could only > manage > > > DMA32. I doubt it wants THPS, but shmem_enabled=force forces > them.) > > Oh, I'd forgotten all about that gma500 aspect: > well, I can send a fixup later on.
I already have code to fix that, which somebody earlier in this discussion convinced me to throw away. Want me to send it as a patch 4/3 ? -- All Rights Reversed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
