Rik van Riel wrote: > Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has there been some thought about an incremental fsck? > > > > You know, somehow fencing a sub-dir to do an online fsck? > > Search for "chunkfs"
Sure, and there is TileFS too. But why wouldn't it be possible to do this on the current fs infrastructure, using just a smart fsck, working incrementally on some sub-dir? Thanks! -- Al -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
