On Wednesday 09 January 2008 14:33:50 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:20:18 +1100 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 January 2008 11:21:59 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The string handling in here has become a bit scruffy.
> >
> > Yes, that patch also evokes a const warning.  Fixed below.
>
> No patch was included.

Yes, I decided it's a secret.  Mine, all mine!

> >  I assume you've
> > queued these because you're thinking of applying them before 2.6.24?  I'd
> > say only
> > modules-de-mutex-more-symbol-lookup-paths-in-the-module-code.patch
> > warrants that (the other is unlikely and not a regression).
>
> Actually I was thinking 2.6.25 on both.

Then, you should get them next time you grab my series, no?  Or is that 
particular lever not working yet?

Hmm, I see my link was not updated (damn, ln -sfn, not ln -sf!).  Fixed now:
        http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/

More goodies there than a UK comedy convention...

> OK, 2.6.24 seems reasonable.

Kyle acked it at least...

> Yes, it could all do with a revisit.

And it goes without saying that glory awaits they who succeed...
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to