On Wednesday 09 January 2008 14:33:50 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:20:18 +1100 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 January 2008 11:21:59 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > The string handling in here has become a bit scruffy. > > > > Yes, that patch also evokes a const warning. Fixed below. > > No patch was included.
Yes, I decided it's a secret. Mine, all mine! > > I assume you've > > queued these because you're thinking of applying them before 2.6.24? I'd > > say only > > modules-de-mutex-more-symbol-lookup-paths-in-the-module-code.patch > > warrants that (the other is unlikely and not a regression). > > Actually I was thinking 2.6.25 on both. Then, you should get them next time you grab my series, no? Or is that particular lever not working yet? Hmm, I see my link was not updated (damn, ln -sfn, not ln -sf!). Fixed now: http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/ More goodies there than a UK comedy convention... > OK, 2.6.24 seems reasonable. Kyle acked it at least... > Yes, it could all do with a revisit. And it goes without saying that glory awaits they who succeed... Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/