On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Val Henson wrote: > There is a use for an optimized socket->socket transfer - proxying > high speed TCP connections. It would be exciting if the zerocopy > networking framework led to a decent socket->socket transfer. if you are proxying connextions you should really be looking at what data you pass through your proxy. now replay proxying with routing and I would agree with you (but I'll bet this is handled in the kernel IP stack anyway) David Lang - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rick Jones
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Peter Samuelson
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Val Henson
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Lang
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Val Henson
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Lang
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ion Badulescu
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Sasi Peter
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Alan Cox