On Wednesday 09 January 2008 10:51, David Howells wrote: > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No. I mean call the bit PG_private2. That way non-pagecache and > > > > filesystems that don't use fscache can use it. > > > > > > The bit is called PG_owner_priv_2, and then 'subclassed' to PG_fscache, > > > much like PG_owner_priv_1 is 'subclassed' to PG_checked as was > > > recommended. > > > > It is not owner_priv if you're putting checks and tests into core > > kernel pagecache code for it. owner_priv means a filesystem has it > > _all_ to itself. > > Okay, I'll change it if it makes you happy.
It is to make everybody happy. Especially in code that everyone works on like mm/ and fs/, you can't just have everybody following their own slightly different conventions. > Bear in mind, though, you're > dictating instructions that conflict with those other people have dictated. Can you point me to the posts. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
