On Mon, Feb 22 2021 at 21:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On a 32-bit fast syscall that fails to read its arguments from user
> memory, the kernel currently does syscall exit work but not
> syscall exit work.
and this sentence does not make any sense.
> This would confuse audit and ptrace.
Would? It does confuse it, right?
> This is a minimal fix intended for ease of backporting. A more
> complete cleanup is coming.
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 0b085e68f407 ("x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 0904f5676e4d..cf4dcf346ca8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs
> *regs)
> regs->ax = -EFAULT;
>
> instrumentation_end();
> - syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> + local_irq_disable();
> + exit_to_user_mode();
While I suggested this with tired brain yesterday night, it's not really
correct as it does not go through exit_to_user_mode_prepare() which it
really has to.
Thanks,
tglx
