Andi Kleen wrote: > Here's a proposal for some useful code transformations the kernel janitors > could do as opposed to running checkpatch.pl. > <snip>
I notice that every driver in drivers/ata uses a .ioctl that points to ata_scsi_ioctl(). I could add the BKL to that function, and then change all of the drivers to .unlocked_ioctl, but I assume this would be a candidate to actually clean up by determining why the lock is needed and removing it if necessary. Does anyone know off-hand the reason for needing the lock (I assume someone does or it wouldn't have survived this long)? If the lock is absolutely required, then I can write the patch to add lock_kernel() and unlock_kernel(). -- Kevin Winchester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
