Hi Jisheng,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:44 AM Jisheng Zhang
<jisheng.zh...@synaptics.com> wrote:
>
> Add tracepoints to retrieve information about the invoke_fn. This would
> help to measure how many invoke_fn are triggered and how long it takes
> to complete one invoke_fn call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jisheng.zh...@synaptics.com>
> ---
>
> Since v1:
> - add BUILD_BUG_ON() macro usage to make sure that the size of what is being
> copied, is not smaller than the amount being copied. Thank Steve.
> - move optee_trace.h to keep include headers sorted
>
> drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 4 ++
> drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> index 780d7c4fd756..0da6fe50f1af 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include "optee_private.h"
> #include "optee_smc.h"
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include "optee_trace.h"
>
> struct optee_call_waiter {
> struct list_head list_node;
> @@ -138,9 +140,11 @@ u32 optee_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx,
> phys_addr_t parg)
> while (true) {
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
>
> + trace_optee_invoke_fn_begin(¶m);
> optee->invoke_fn(param.a0, param.a1, param.a2, param.a3,
> param.a4, param.a5, param.a6, param.a7,
> &res);
> + trace_optee_invoke_fn_end(¶m, &res);
>
> if (res.a0 == OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_ETHREAD_LIMIT) {
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7c954eefa4bf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_trace.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * optee trace points
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Synaptics Incorporated
> + * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@kernel.org>
> + */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> +#define TRACE_SYSTEM optee
> +
> +#if !defined(_TRACE_OPTEE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> +#define _TRACE_OPTEE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> +#include "optee_private.h"
> +
Checkpatch has some complaints below. Is that something that could be
fixed or is this so far from regular C-syntax that we don't care?
Thanks,
Jens
> +TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_begin,
> + TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param),
> + TP_ARGS(param),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(void *, param)
> + __array(u32, args, 8)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->param = param;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*param) < sizeof(__entry->args));
> + memcpy(__entry->args, param, sizeof(__entry->args));
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("param=%p (%x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x, %x)", __entry->param,
> + __entry->args[0], __entry->args[1], __entry->args[2],
> + __entry->args[3], __entry->args[4], __entry->args[5],
> + __entry->args[6], __entry->args[7])
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(optee_invoke_fn_end,
> + TP_PROTO(struct optee_rpc_param *param, struct arm_smccc_res *res),
> + TP_ARGS(param, res),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(void *, param)
> + __array(unsigned long, rets, 4)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->param = param;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*res) < sizeof(__entry->rets));
> + memcpy(__entry->rets, res, sizeof(__entry->rets));
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("param=%p ret (%lx, %lx, %lx, %lx)", __entry->param,
> + __entry->rets[0], __entry->rets[1], __entry->rets[2],
> + __entry->rets[3])
> +);
> +#endif /* _TRACE_OPTEE_H */
> +
> +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
> +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
> +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE optee_trace
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> --
> 2.30.0
>
