Hi Ingo,
after you asked me to work against x86.git[1] I noticed
that 4 out of 5 of my previous patches didn't make sense any longer.

While I was compiling the kernel, and hopefully starting doing something
more useful (Sam, again thank you for the hints), 
I create these 4 very simple patches fixing some coding style issue.

[PATCH 1/4] x86: coding style fixes in /arch/x86/pci/common.c
[PATCH 2/4] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
[PATCH 3/4] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/pci/direct.c
[PATCH 4/4] x86: coding style fixes in arch/x86/pci/fixup.c

And here is the diffstat:
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c   |    4 ++--
 arch/x86/pci/common.c |   12 +++++-------
 arch/x86/pci/direct.c |   10 +++++-----
 arch/x86/pci/fixup.c  |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)


[1] git-pull 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git mm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to