Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:41:38PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> The parameters to max9286_i2c_mux_configure() fits on the previous
> line. Adjust it.
>
> Cosmetic change only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> index 6fd4d59fcc72..1d9951215868 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> @@ -287,9 +287,8 @@ static int max9286_i2c_mux_select(struct i2c_mux_core
> *muxc, u32 chan)
>
> priv->mux_channel = chan;
>
> - max9286_i2c_mux_configure(priv,
> - MAX9286_FWDCCEN(chan) |
> - MAX9286_REVCCEN(chan));
> + max9286_i2c_mux_configure(priv, MAX9286_FWDCCEN(chan) |
> + MAX9286_REVCCEN(chan));
I feel obliged to say I would have written
max9286_i2c_mux_configure(priv, MAX9286_FWDCCEN(chan) |
MAX9286_REVCCEN(chan));
:-)
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
>
> return 0;
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
