On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 11:20 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote: > On Mon, 7 January 2008 11:05:26 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > Would something like this work for people? > > Looks a lot better than what I thought of. However, does the #ifdef > within is_module_address() make sense when afaict lockdep is the only > caller of that function? Looks as if the whole function should be made > conditional or none of it.
Ah, I hadn't bothered to check if there were more users. /me does a (not so quick) git grep and finds lockdep is indeed the only caller. Sure, we can move the whole function into the ifdef. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
