On Sun, Jan 06 2008 at 5:43 +0200, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> This all still leaves the question unanswered why that commit 
> 6f5391c283d7fdcf24bf40786ea79061919d1e1d changed any behaviour at all. 
> Because the thing that Peter is describing has nothing to do with any 
> low-level drivers what-so-ever.
> 
>               Linus
> 

James Matthew.
I have a (very) wild guess at what maybe have changed with the cmnd->done
patch:

Do you remember the effective loop in scsi_lib:scsi_end_request() where
if bufflen was smaller then original request size, do to truncation
of bufflen by ULD, then the remaining of the request is re-queued again
as a new scsi-command. Well I think that the old system would call
cmnd->done for every iteration, and the new system, since the done is
called by the block-Q, does not see the resubmit of the new command.

I have not followed all code path of the matter, but I know that sr does
alters bufflen in some cases. 
All this is not a bug in itself, but it is a change in behavior that might 
cause the current sr hack to fail.

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to