On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > > > > Il giorno 29 gen 2021, alle ore 11:51, Chunguang Xu <brookxu...@gmail.com> > > ha scritto: > > > > From: Chunguang Xu <broo...@tencent.com> > > > > The if statement at the end of the function is obviously useless, > > maybe we can delete it. > > > > Thanks for spotting this mistake. > > Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.vale...@linaro.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <broo...@tencent.com> > > --- > > block/bfq-wf2q.c | 3 --- > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c > > index 26776bd..070e34a 100644 > > --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c > > +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c > > @@ -137,9 +137,6 @@ static bool bfq_update_next_in_service(struct > > bfq_sched_data *sd, > > > > sd->next_in_service = next_in_service; > > > > - if (!next_in_service) > > - return parent_sched_may_change; > > -
Unless I'm missing something, this has already been fixed here: https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-5.12/block&id=1a23e06cdab2be07cbda460c6417d7de564c48e6 > > return parent_sched_may_change; > > } > > > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > > > -- Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
