On 22/12/2020 14:09, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> Add MT8192 basic clock providers, include topckgen, apmixedsys,
> infracfg and pericfg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi...@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/clk/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c | 1326
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h | 15 +
> 4 files changed, 1350 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
>
[...]
> +static int clk_mt8192_apmixed_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + int r;
> +
> + clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_APMIXED_NR_CLK);
> + if (!clk_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mtk_clk_register_plls(node, plls, ARRAY_SIZE(plls), clk_data);
> + r = mtk_clk_register_gates(node, apmixed_clks,
> ARRAY_SIZE(apmixed_clks), clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + return r;
> +
> + return of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_onecell_get, clk_data);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id of_match_clk_mt8192[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-apmixedsys",
> + .data = clk_mt8192_apmixed_probe,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-topckgen",
> + .data = clk_mt8192_top_probe,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-infracfg",
> + .data = clk_mt8192_infra_probe,
> + }, {
> + .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-pericfg",
> + .data = clk_mt8192_peri_probe,
> + }, {
> + /* sentinel */
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static int clk_mt8192_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int (*clk_probe)(struct platform_device *pdev);
> + int r;
> +
> + clk_probe = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!clk_probe)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + r = clk_probe(pdev);
> + if (r)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register clock provider: %s:
> %d\n", pdev->name, r);
> +
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver clk_mt8192_drv = {
> + .probe = clk_mt8192_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "clk-mt8192",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_clk_mt8192,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init clk_mt8192_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&clk_mt8192_drv);
> +}
> +
> +arch_initcall(clk_mt8192_init);
Do we really need all these clocks that early?
Why don't we use CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() then and why do we initialize some
clocks CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER and other with arch_initcall?
I know that this is in other drivers for MediaTek SoCs, but that does not mean
it's the right approach.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> index f5625f4..afbc7df 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,21 @@ struct mtk_mux {
> _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, \
> CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
>
> +#define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs,
> \
> + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags) \
> + GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> + 0, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, \
> + mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops)
> +
> +#define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs,
> \
> + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> + _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> + MUX_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, \
> + _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, \
> + _width, _upd_ofs, _upd, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
> +
Why can't we do something like:
#define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
_mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
_upd_ofs, _upd) \
GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
_mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
0, _upd_ofs, _upd, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
\
mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops)
> struct clk *mtk_clk_register_mux(const struct mtk_mux *mux,
> struct regmap *regmap,
> spinlock_t *lock);
>
