Russell King wrote: > > Manfred Spraul writes: > > Not yet, but that would be a 2 line patch (currently it's hardcoded to > > BYTES_PER_WORD align or L1_CACHE_BYTES, depending on the HWCACHE_ALIGN > > flag). > > I don't think there's a problem then. However, if slab can be told "I want > 1024 bytes aligned to 1024 bytes" then I can get rid of > arch/arm/mm/small_page.c (separate problem to the one we're discussing > though) ;) > That's easy, I'll include it in my next slab update. -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental patch] UHCI... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental pa... Russell King
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimenta... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Inefficient PCI DM... David Brownell
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimental pa... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experimenta... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [experim... Russell King
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [exp... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was:... Russell King
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (... Manfred Spraul
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was: [exp... Johannes Erdfelt
- Re: Inefficient PCI DMA usage (was:... Russell King