gcc version: 11.0.0 20210208 (experimental) (GCC)

Following build error on arm64:

.......
In function ‘printf’,
    inlined from ‘regs_dump__printf’ at util/session.c:1141:3,
    inlined from ‘regs__printf’ at util/session.c:1169:2:
/usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:107:10: \
  error: ‘%-5s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]

107 |   return __printf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, \
                __va_arg_pack ());

......
In function ‘fprintf’,
  inlined from ‘perf_sample__fprintf_regs.isra’ at \
    builtin-script.c:622:14:
/usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:100:10: \
    error: ‘%5s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=]
  100 |   return __fprintf_chk (__stream, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt,
  101 |                         __va_arg_pack ());

cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
.......

This patch fixes Wformat-overflow warnings. Add ternary operator,
The statement evaluates to "Unknown" if reg_name==NULL is met.

Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <jianlin...@arm.com>
---
v2: Add ternary operator to avoid similar errors in other arch.
---
 tools/perf/builtin-script.c                            | 4 +++-
 tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 4 +++-
 tools/perf/util/session.c                              | 5 +++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
index 42dad4a0f8cf..d59da3a063d0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
@@ -635,6 +635,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_regs(struct regs_dump 
*regs, uint64_t mask,
 {
        unsigned i = 0, r;
        int printed = 0;
+       const char *reg_name;
 
        if (!regs || !regs->regs)
                return 0;
@@ -643,7 +644,8 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_regs(struct regs_dump 
*regs, uint64_t mask,
 
        for_each_set_bit(r, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
                u64 val = regs->regs[i++];
-               printed += fprintf(fp, "%5s:0x%"PRIx64" ", perf_reg_name(r), 
val);
+               reg_name = perf_reg_name(r);
+               printed += fprintf(fp, "%5s:0x%"PRIx64" ", reg_name ?: 
"Unknown", val);
        }
 
        return printed;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c 
b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
index c83c2c6564e0..e1222cc6a699 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
@@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static int regs_map(struct regs_dump *regs, uint64_t mask, 
char *bf, int size)
 {
        unsigned int i = 0, r;
        int printed = 0;
+       const char *reg_name;
 
        bf[0] = 0;
 
@@ -700,9 +701,10 @@ static int regs_map(struct regs_dump *regs, uint64_t mask, 
char *bf, int size)
        for_each_set_bit(r, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
                u64 val = regs->regs[i++];
 
+               reg_name = perf_reg_name(r);
                printed += scnprintf(bf + printed, size - printed,
                                     "%5s:0x%" PRIx64 " ",
-                                    perf_reg_name(r), val);
+                                    reg_name ?: "Unknown", val);
        }
 
        return printed;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 25adbcce0281..1058d8487e98 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -1135,12 +1135,13 @@ static void branch_stack__printf(struct perf_sample 
*sample, bool callstack)
 static void regs_dump__printf(u64 mask, u64 *regs)
 {
        unsigned rid, i = 0;
+       const char *reg_name;
 
        for_each_set_bit(rid, (unsigned long *) &mask, sizeof(mask) * 8) {
                u64 val = regs[i++];
-
+               reg_name = perf_reg_name(rid);
                printf(".... %-5s 0x%016" PRIx64 "\n",
-                      perf_reg_name(rid), val);
+                      reg_name ?: "Unknown", val);
        }
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to