On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:16 AM Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: [..] > > diff --git a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c > > index 8336535f1e11..53f93a506626 100644 > > --- a/drivers/base/auxiliary.c > > +++ b/drivers/base/auxiliary.c > > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static void __exit auxiliary_bus_exit(void) > > bus_unregister(&auxiliary_bus_type); > > } > > > > -module_init(auxiliary_bus_init); > > +subsys_initcall(auxiliary_bus_init); > > Ah, the linker priority dance. Are you _SURE_ this will solve this?
All users are module_init() today so it will work.... today. The moment someone wants to use it in a built-in driver that uses subsystem_init() it will ultimately be chased into driver_init(). > Why not just call this explicitly in driver_init() so that you know it > will be ok? Just like we do for the platform bus? Cross that bridge when / if it happens?
