On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:53:53PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2021-02-09 18:56:13, Yafang Shao wrote:
... > I am sorry for my ignorance. I am not familiar with MM. > But it is pretty hard to understand what call does what. > > I have found the following comment in include/linux/page_flags.h: > > * The page flags field is split into two parts, the main flags area > * which extends from the low bits upwards, and the fields area which > * extends from the high bits downwards. > > Sigh, I know that you already reworked this several times because > people "nitpicked" about the code style. But it seems that it > rather diverged instead of converged. > > What about the following? Isn't is some like v1 or v2? > Note: It is inpired by the names "main area" and "fields area" > mentioned in the above comment from page_flags.h. > I have later realized that "page_flags_layout" actually made > sense as well. Feel free to rename page_flags_fileds > back to page_flags_layout. > > Anyway, this is my proposal: What about to create a one format_flags() function which accepts new data structure and do something like buf = format_flags(main_area); buf = format_flags(fields_area); return buf; ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
