"Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, there's a lot of code and I know that there are bugs in it. I > just want to focus on the kernel-related issue that the strace fragment > that I posted brings up: even if my user code gets completely screwed up > (corrupts its stack, runs out of FDs/VM/threads etc), I don't think that I > should see in the strace output that accept() has returned > ERESTARTSYS.
strace always sees the raw return value, before the signal handler is executed and before the check for syscall restart is done. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
