-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Today, Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Just wait. My crystal ball is infallible. One of these days, that line will be your downfall :-) *grins* Mo. - -- Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG/PGP Key: pub 1024D/76A275F9 2000-07-22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjpp/ssACgkQRcGgB3aidfmcagCgkieTFD77O+Xqn+nmcaoiYERh UwwAoIL8cWZPdaKine4fZ4fJmQqwTvBZ =i1Ax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Woodhouse
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Kai Henningsen
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Mo McKinlay
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Schwartz
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Helge Hafting
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? James Sutherland