On Thursday 03 January 2008 10:35, Mike Travis wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Have you done anything more with allowing > 256 CPUS in this spinlock > patch? We've been testing with 1k cpus and to verify with -mm kernel, > we need to "unpatch" these spinlock changes. > > Thanks, > Mike
Hi Mike, Actually I had it in my mind that 64 bit used single-byte locking like i386, so I didn't think I'd caused a regression there. I'll take a look at fixing that up now. Thanks, Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
