On 01-02-21, 22:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Thanks, looks okay. > > Although, I think the previous variant of coding style was a bit more > appropriate, i.e. like this: > > dev_err_probe(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret); > > return ERR_PTR(ret);
Okay will move to that. -- viresh
