On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > But yes, this is one of the rare cases where a typedef makes sense, > > but ???'d call it osd_off_t or something like that. > > > > You mean osd_cdb_offset_t. I thought of dropping that _t, I hate it, > just a personal preference.
No, I mean osd_off_t :) off vs offset is purely cosmetic, but in Linux we have a strong preference for short typenames. Just look how ugly the prototype and struct defintion in your original posting look :) Also I thing the _cdb is superflous because there is no other offset type in the OSD spec. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
