On 2021-01-27, Michael Kelley <mikel...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> In preparation for removing printk's @logbuf_lock, dumpers that have
>> assumed to be protected against parallel calls must provide their own
>> synchronization. Add a locally static spinlock to synchronize the
>> kmsg_dump call.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogn...@linutronix.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
>> index fbeddef90941..08db95e1a139 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
>> @@ -1362,23 +1362,27 @@ static void hv_kmsg_dump(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper,
>>                       enum kmsg_dump_reason reason,
>>                       struct kmsg_dumper_iter *iter)
>>  {
>> +    static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
>>      size_t bytes_written;
>>      phys_addr_t panic_pa;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> 
>>      /* We are only interested in panics. */
>>      if ((reason != KMSG_DUMP_PANIC) || (!sysctl_record_panic_msg))
>>              return;
>> 
>> +    if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&lock, flags))
>> +            return;
>> +
>>      panic_pa = virt_to_phys(hv_panic_page);
>> 
>> -    /*
>> -     * Write dump contents to the page. No need to synchronize; panic should
>> -     * be single-threaded.
>> -     */
>> +    /* Write dump contents to the page. */
>>      kmsg_dump_get_buffer(iter, false, hv_panic_page, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
>>                           &bytes_written);
>>      if (bytes_written)
>>              hyperv_report_panic_msg(panic_pa, bytes_written);
>> +
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock, flags);
>>  }
>> 
>>  static struct kmsg_dumper hv_kmsg_dumper = {
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>
> I don't think this patch is needed.   Per some of the unmodified code
> above, and the comment, we proceed to the call to kmsg_dump_get_buffer()
> only in the panic path.  Code in the panic path prior to invoking kmsg_dump()
> ensures that we are single-threaded on a single CPU.   So I think everything
> is good here without the new spin lock.  The subsequent call to
> hyperv_report_panic_msg() also assumes that we are single-threaded.

You are correct. I will withdraw this patch from the series. Thanks for
the feedback.

John Ogness

Reply via email to