On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:33:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Tested on x86. > > > > Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayahanalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > thanks Ananth, i've updated the patch.
Hi Ingo, > btw., do you have some script that i could use to test kprobes > functionality? Right now the only time i notice kprobes regressions is > when randconfig picks up CONFIG_NET_TCPPROBE=y which activates kprobes. > > It would be so much nicer if kprobes had some runs-during-bootup kind of > quick self-test, with all the important functionality unit-tested. Like > lib/locking-selftest.c, or CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=y. The simplest way to do a basic sanity check is build the kprobes samples/ and try them out. We have one sample each to test kprobes, kretprobes and jprobes. This should serve the purpose. I had posted patches for the same sometime back (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119297044801420&w=2), but they needed some rework to fix a build break on sparc64 (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119735423212298&w=2). I will rebase the patchset against the latest mm and repost soon... Ananth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
