On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, KaiGai Kohei wrote: > > Another issue is that securityfs depends on CONFIG_SECURITY, which might be > > undesirable, given that capabilities are a standard feature. > > We can implement this feature on another pseudo filesystems. > Do you think what filesystem is the best candidate? > I prefer procfs or sysfs instead.
Sysfs makes more sense, as this information is system-wide and does not relate to specific processes. -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
