> So smbfs is still considered rock solid while no serious distribution > would be crazy enough to ship the EXPERIMENTAL NFSv4 support to their > customers?
Thats a different problem. The kernel as I've said many times has no proper process for - removing expired/missing maintainers - handling stuff that decays - removing dead documentation - removing dead drivers and ports Although you've certainly started on fixing much of that. > I'm not claiming that all EXPERIMENTAL tags were wrong [1], but many > were wrong. So why not fix the wrong tags, and mark smbfs obsolete ? > Plus the fact that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL controlled so many different > things with one switch that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=n .config's are really > rare. Agreed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
