On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:27:49AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: SNIP
> perf script --symbols=noploop,0x4007a0 > > + Support filtering trace records by symbol name, start address of > + symbol, any hexadecimal address and address range. > + > + The comparison order is: > + 1. symbol name comparison > + 2. symbol start address comparison. > + 3. any hexadecimal address comparison. > + 4. address range comparison (see --addr-range). > + > +--addr-range:: > + Use with -S or --symbols to list traced records within address range. > + > + For example, to list the traced records within the address range > + [0x4007a0, 0x0x4007a9]: > + perf script -S 0x4007a0 --addr-range 10 > + > --call-trace:: > Show call stream for intel_pt traces. The CPUs are interleaved, but > can be filtered with -C. > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > index edacfa98d073..e0feda33dbb9 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c > @@ -3525,6 +3525,8 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv) > "system-wide collection from all CPUs"), > OPT_STRING('S', "symbols", &symbol_conf.sym_list_str, > "symbol[,symbol...]", > "only consider these symbols"), > + OPT_INTEGER(0, "addr-range", &symbol_conf.addr_range, > + "Use with -S to list traced records within address range"), > OPT_CALLBACK_OPTARG(0, "insn-trace", &itrace_synth_opts, NULL, NULL, > "Decode instructions from itrace", parse_insn_trace), > OPT_CALLBACK_OPTARG(0, "xed", NULL, NULL, NULL, > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util/event.c > index fbe8578e4c47..525b859cb445 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/event.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.c > @@ -645,6 +645,22 @@ struct symbol *thread__find_symbol_fb(struct thread > *thread, u8 cpumode, > return al->sym; > } > > +static bool check_address_range(struct strlist *sym_list, int addr_range, > + struct addr_location *al) > +{ > + struct str_node *pos; > + char *endptr; > + u64 addr, al_addr = al->map->unmap_ip(al->map, al->addr); > + > + strlist__for_each_entry(pos, sym_list) { > + addr = strtoull(pos->s, &endptr, 16); > + if (al_addr >= addr && al_addr < addr + addr_range) > + return true; > + } > + > + return false; > +} > + > /* > * Callers need to drop the reference to al->thread, obtained in > * machine__findnew_thread() > @@ -709,6 +725,26 @@ int machine__resolve(struct machine *machine, struct > addr_location *al, > ret = strlist__has_entry(symbol_conf.sym_list, > al_addr_str); > } > + if (!ret && al->map) { > + snprintf(al_addr_str, sz, "0x%"PRIx64, > + al->map->unmap_ip(al->map, al->addr)); > + ret = strlist__has_entry(symbol_conf.sym_list, > + al_addr_str); > + if (!ret) { > + /* Check for hex without "0x" prefix */ > + snprintf(al_addr_str, sz, "%"PRIx64, > + al->map->unmap_ip(al->map, al->addr)); > + ret = strlist__has_entry(symbol_conf.sym_list, > + al_addr_str); > + } that seems tricky.. what if user specify more leading zeros, I think it'd be better to search intlist instead we could move all 'address' entries from sym_list to new intlist (in symbol__init) and use it for this search jirka