On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:20 AM Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > From: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com> > > > > Account memory consumed by secretmem to memcg. The accounting is updated > > when the memory is actually allocated and freed. > > I think this is wrong. It fails to account subsequent allocators from > the same PMD. If you want to track like this, you need separate pools > per memcg. >
Are these secretmem pools shared between different jobs/memcgs?
