On 22/01/2021 16:25:47+0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:35 PM <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com> wrote: > > > > From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@microchip.com> > > > > Arnd, Olof, > > > > I'm taking back the lead on sending the pull-requests for AT91 and hope > > that I > > didn't loose the knowledge in the meantime. Tell me if there's something I'm > > missing. Thanks a lot to Alexandre who kept our flow steady and very > > predictable during all those years! > > > > Here are the first SoC changes for 5.12 which contain a single patch for > > multi > > platform kernels. > > > > I plan to send another pull-request for the SoC changes related to new > > sama7g5 > > that Claudiu sent to the mainling-list recently. I'll let it mature in > > linux-next by the beginning of next week and will send another pull-request > > by > > mid-next-week. > > Tell me if you see a problem with this approach. > > This all looks good to me, but I think I'd rather take the 'soc' pull request > into the v5.11 bugfixes, as this may already affect users on other machines. > > I would also suggest adding a 'Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org' tag. If you like, > I can just cherry-pick that patch into the fixes branch and add it there. >
I wouldn't backport it as a fix, this is just a warning, in a configuration that is very unlikely to be used (and honestly, I wouldn't enable this driver on any platform). If you take it as a fix, you'll have to also get https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1611318097-8970-5-git-send-email-claudiu.bez...@microchip.com/ -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
