On 01/22/21 at 09:40am, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 22.01.21 08:03, Baoquan He wrote: > > Kernel test robot calling make with 'W=1' triggering warning like below > > below for memmap_init_zone() function. > > > > mm/page_alloc.c:6259:23: warning: no previous prototype for > > 'memmap_init_zone' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 6259 | void __meminit __weak memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Fix it by adding the function declaration in include/linux/mm.h. > > Since memmap_init_zone() has a generic version with '__weak', > > the declaratoin in ia64 header file can be simply removed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> > > --- > > arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 ----- > > include/linux/mm.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > index 2c81394a2430..9b4efe89e62d 100644 > > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/pgtable.h > > @@ -517,11 +517,6 @@ extern struct page *zero_page_memmap_ptr; > > __changed; \ > > }) > > #endif > > - > > -# ifdef CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP > > - /* arch mem_map init routine is needed due to holes in a virtual mem_map > > */ > > - extern void memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone); > > -# endif /* CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP */ > > # endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ > > > > /* > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > > index 56bb239f9150..073049bd0b29 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > > @@ -2401,6 +2401,7 @@ extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long > > new_dma_reserve); > > extern void memmap_init_range(unsigned long, int, unsigned long, > > unsigned long, unsigned long, enum meminit_context, > > struct vmem_altmap *, int migratetype); > > +extern void memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone); > > extern void setup_per_zone_wmarks(void); > > extern int __meminit init_per_zone_wmark_min(void); > > extern void mem_init(void); > > > > This patch is on top of your other series, no? > > In -next, we have > > extern void memmap_init_zone(unsigned long, int, unsigned long, ... > > In that file, so something is wrong.
Right, this one is based on the memmap_init_xx clean up patchset. I mentioned this the the sub-thread of kernel test robot reporting issues.
