On Dec 29, 2007 10:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:10:57AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > @@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ void pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, v > > next = dev->bus_list.next; > > > > /* Run device routines with the device locked */ > > - down(&dev->dev.sem); > > + mutex_lock(&dev->dev.mutex); > > cb(dev, userdata); > > - up(&dev->dev.sem); > > + mutex_unlock(&dev->dev.mutex); > > } > > up_read(&pci_bus_sem); > > } > > Patches should be self-contained for ease of bisecting. I can't tell > whether this patch is correct or not because you haven't included all > the other places that need to change at the same time as this.
Hi, I will repost them after some fixes. > > -- > Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine > "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this > operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such > a retrograde step." > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
