Mo McKinlay wrote: > Nono, that's not what I mean - each of the filesystems fails if it > doesn't support what you're trying to do, that's given - but having a > different delimeter registered by the filesystem (and hence the > possibility of every single filesystem using a different delimeter) brings > about a completely different kind of inconsistency. True. Which is why I'd prefer a standard delimiter. ":" seems to be the top candidate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Mo McKinlay
- Re: named streams, extende... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: named streams, extende... Michael Rothwell
- Re: named streams, extende... Daniel Phillips
- Re: named streams, extende... Thunder from the hill
- Re: named streams, extende... alex
- RE: named streams, extended attributes, and posix Leif Sawyer
- RE: named streams, extended attributes, and pos... Steven N. Hirsch