Hi John, Le 27/12/2007, Jon Smirl écrit: >On 12/19/07, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Another rework of the i2c for powerpc device tree patch. This version >> implements standard alias naming only on the powerpc platform and only for >> the device tree names. The old naming mechanism of >> i2c_client.name,driver_name is left in place and not changed for non-powerpc >> platforms. This patch is fully capable of dynamically loading the i2c >> modules. You can modprobe in the i2c-mpc driver and the i2c modules >> described in the device tree will be automatically loaded. Modules also work >> if compiled in. > >Are there any further objections to this patch? Can it all go in >through the powerpc trees or do the i2c people want to send it on?
I am on vacation until January 4th. I will review your patchset the week following my return. Thanks for your patience, -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
