Hi Chaitanya, (drop in-person Cc..)
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 09:06:25PM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: ...it would be nice if you could update the subject line to "erofs: use bio_init_fields xxxx" The same to the following patch [RFC PATCH 32/37]... Also, IMHO, these two patches could be merged as one patch if possible, although just my own thoughts. Thanks, Gao Xiang > Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulka...@wdc.com> > --- > fs/erofs/data.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/data.c b/fs/erofs/data.c > index ea4f693bee22..15f3a3f01fa3 100644 > --- a/fs/erofs/data.c > +++ b/fs/erofs/data.c > @@ -220,10 +220,8 @@ static inline struct bio *erofs_read_raw_page(struct bio > *bio, > > bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nblocks); > > - bio->bi_end_io = erofs_readendio; > - bio_set_dev(bio, sb->s_bdev); > - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = (sector_t)blknr << > - LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK; > + bio_init_fields(bio, sb->s_bdev, (sector_t)blknr << > + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK, NULL, erofs_readendio, 0, 0); > bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_READ | (ra ? REQ_RAHEAD : 0); > } > > -- > 2.22.1 >
