On 16.01.21 10:26, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The variable avoid_reserve is meaningless because we never changed its
> value and just passed it to alloc_huge_page(). So remove it to make code
> more clear that in hugetlbfs_fallocate, we never avoid reserve when alloc
> hugepage yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmia...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index 88751e35e69d..23ad6ed8b75f 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int 
> mode, loff_t offset,
>                */
>               struct page *page;
>               unsigned long addr;
> -             int avoid_reserve = 0;
>  
>               cond_resched();
>  
> @@ -717,7 +716,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int 
> mode, loff_t offset,
>               }
>  
>               /* Allocate page and add to page cache */
> -             page = alloc_huge_page(&pseudo_vma, addr, avoid_reserve);
> +             page = alloc_huge_page(&pseudo_vma, addr, 0);
>               hugetlb_drop_vma_policy(&pseudo_vma);
>               if (IS_ERR(page)) {
>                       mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to