Hi,
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:36 PM Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> this is an impressive patch.
>
> We definitely need to touch base with Bjorn on this, preferably also
> Sboyd.
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:35 PM Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > Fixes: 4b7618fdc7e6 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio")
> > Fixes: 71266d9d3936 ("pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to
> > .irq_request_resources callback")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
>
> Some mechanics:
I just realized that I addressed everyone's comments but yours. Doh!
> 1. Does this need to go into stable? Or is current (non-urgent) fine? Or fixes
> for v5.10? I.e. required destination.
It probably ought to go into stable, but I'll leave it up to you which
version of Linux it lands in. I don't personally know if anyone is
criticall waiting on this to land upstream. For Chrome OS we're not
desperate for it because we've already landed a temporary revert of
Maulik's previous patch and the extra clearing of the masked
interrupts isn't causing any really visible problems for us.
> 2. If it does, should patches 1-3 also go into stable? And are they
> prerequisites?
Yeah, the last patch requires the previous ones, so they would all
need to go into stable together.
-Doug
