On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:42:37 -0600 Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > > It would all look a lot more solid if this locking was retained and both > > ecryptfs_tfm_exists() and ecryptfs_add_new_key_tfm() were designed to be > > called under key_tfm_list_mutex. > > Hmm good point, sorry for missing that. How's this look? key_tfm_list_mutex gets used in fs/ecryptfs/main.c but it is static in fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
