> > microseconds/yield > > # threads 2.2.16-22 2.4 2.4-multi-queue > > ------------ --------- -------- --------------- > > 16 18.740 4.603 1.455 > > I remeber the O(1) scheduler from Davide Libenzi was beating the mainline O(N) isn't the normal case (as in "The Right Case to optimize") where there are close to zero runnable tasks? what realistic/sane scenarios have very large numbers of spinning threads? all server situations I can think of do not. not volanomark -loopback, surely! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler upd... Mike Kravetz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler... Mike Kravetz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue sche... Mike Kravetz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue ... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue ... Mike Kravetz
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue ... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler upd... Davide Libenzi
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update David Lang
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mark Hahn
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Davide Libenzi
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: multi-queue scheduler update Andi Kleen
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update John Clemens
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Mike Kravetz
- Re: multi-queue scheduler update Gerhard Mack
- Re: [Lse-tech] multi-queue scheduler update Jun Nakajima