* Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmmmm... Some tests here on an 8p 8G machine:
> In an extreme case (boot with slub_min_order=9 to get huge page sized > slabs) SLUB can win against SLAB: > > N=10 Time: 0.338 Minimally faster > N=20 Time: 0.560 10% faster > N=50 Time: 1.353 15% faster what's up with this regression? There's been absolutely no activity about it in the last 8 days: upstream still regresses, -mm still regresses and there are no patches posted for testing. being able to utilize order-0 pages was supposed to be one of the big plusses of SLUB, so booting with _2MB_ sized slabs cannot be seriously the "fix", right? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/