On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 04:42:59PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:39 PM Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > Add dimensions for load miss and its percentage calculation, which is to > > be displayed in the single cache line output. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> > > --- > > tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c > > index 00014e3d81fa..27745340c14a 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c > > @@ -624,6 +624,10 @@ tot_hitm_cmp(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused, > > (stats)->rmt_hitm + \ > > (stats)->rmt_hit) > > > > +#define TOT_LD_MISS(stats) \ > > + ((stats)->lcl_dram + \ > > + (stats)->rmt_dram) > > + > > Is this true always? I'm not sure if there's a case where stores can go to > DRAM > directly.. maybe like a kind of uncached accesses.
Firstly, from my understanding, the uncached accesses are not accounted in the "load miss" metrics. You could see there have other two metrics "stats->st_uncache" and "stats->ld_uncache" which present the store uncached and load uncached respectively. Furthermore, based on the function total_records(), it uses below formula to account the total load accesses: lclmiss = stats->lcl_dram + stats->rmt_dram + stats->rmt_hitm + stats->rmt_hit; ldcnt = lclmiss + stats->ld_fbhit + stats->ld_l1hit + stats->ld_l2hit + stats->ld_llchit + stats->lcl_hitm; So this patch series classifies these metrics into two numbers: load hit and load miss; load hit is considered as hit at any cache levels (L1, L2, LLC and even remote cache), the load miss is accounted with the rest metrics (lcl_dram + rmt_dram). > Also it can be a static function.. Yeah, will fix. Thanks, Leo