Steven, I've been remiss about updating the mce_record trace as new fields have been added to "struct mce". What are the ABI implications of a patch like the one below (sample only ... there are a couple more fields that may need to be added)?
Are there any size limitations that I might hit adding more items to this record? Thanks -Tony --- include/trace/events/mce.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/trace/events/mce.h b/include/trace/events/mce.h index 1391ada0da3b..cf0e8b9920b7 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/mce.h +++ b/include/trace/events/mce.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record, __field( u8, cs ) __field( u8, bank ) __field( u8, cpuvendor ) + __field( u64, ppin ) + __field( u32, microcode ) ), TP_fast_assign( @@ -53,9 +55,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record, __entry->cs = m->cs; __entry->bank = m->bank; __entry->cpuvendor = m->cpuvendor; + __entry->ppin = m->ppin; + __entry->microcode = m->microcode; ), - TP_printk("CPU: %d, MCGc/s: %llx/%llx, MC%d: %016Lx, IPID: %016Lx, ADDR/MISC/SYND: %016Lx/%016Lx/%016Lx, RIP: %02x:<%016Lx>, TSC: %llx, PROCESSOR: %u:%x, TIME: %llu, SOCKET: %u, APIC: %x", + TP_printk("CPU: %d, MCGc/s: %llx/%llx, MC%d: %016Lx, IPID: %016Lx, ADDR/MISC/SYND: %016Lx/%016Lx/%016Lx, RIP: %02x:<%016Lx>, TSC: %llx, PROCESSOR: %u:%x, TIME: %llu, SOCKET: %u, APIC: %x, PPIN: %llx, MICROCODE: %x", __entry->cpu, __entry->mcgcap, __entry->mcgstatus, __entry->bank, __entry->status, @@ -66,7 +70,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mce_record, __entry->cpuvendor, __entry->cpuid, __entry->walltime, __entry->socketid, - __entry->apicid) + __entry->apicid, __entry->ppin, __entry->microcode) ); #endif /* _TRACE_MCE_H */ -- 2.21.1