On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > I'm all for TCP_CORK but it has the disavantage of two syscalls for doing the > flush of the outgoing queue to the network. And one of those two syscalls is > spurious. Certainly it makes perfect sense that the uncork flushes the outgoing > queue, but I think we should have a way to flush it without exiting the cork-mode. > I believe most software only needs to SIOCPUSH after sending the data and just > before waiting the reply. Sure, I agree. Something like SIOCPUSH would fit very well into the TCP_CORK mentality. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Guus Sliepen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andi Kleen