[...]

> -void __meminit
> -memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
> -          unsigned long start_pfn)
> +void __meminit memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone)
>  {
> +     unsigned long size = zone->spanned_pages;
> +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone), zone_id = zone_idx(zone);
> +     unsigned long start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> +

Nit: reverse Christmas tree.

>       if (!vmem_map) {
> -             memmap_init_range(size, nid, zone, start_pfn, start_pfn + size,
> +             memmap_init_range(size, nid, zone_id, start_pfn, start_pfn + 
> size,
>                                MEMINIT_EARLY, NULL, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
>       } else {
>               struct page *start;
> @@ -556,7 +558,7 @@ memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned 
> long zone,
>               args.start = start;
>               args.end = start + size;
>               args.nid = nid;
> -             args.zone = zone;
> +             args.zone = zone_id;
>  
>               efi_memmap_walk(virtual_memmap_init, &args);
>       }
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 69ebf75be91c..b2a46ffdaf0b 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -6292,16 +6292,16 @@ static inline u64 init_unavailable_range(unsigned 
> long spfn, unsigned long epfn,
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -void __init __weak memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid,
> -                            unsigned long zone,
> -                            unsigned long zone_start_pfn)
> +void __init __weak memmap_init_zone(struct zone *zone)
>  {
>       unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, hole_start_pfn = 0;
> -     unsigned long zone_end_pfn = zone_start_pfn + size;
> +     int i, nid = zone_to_nid(zone), zone_id = zone_idx(zone);
> +     unsigned long zone_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> +     unsigned long zone_end_pfn = zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;

dito.

>       u64 pgcnt = 0;
> -     int i;
>  
>       for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) {
> +             unsigned long size;

You can just get rid of this parameter IMHO.

(Also, there is an empty line missing right now)


Apart from that LGTM

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to