On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:01:56 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 12:27:30 +0530
> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Not all symbols are blacklisted on powerpc. Disable multiple_kprobes
> > test until that is sorted, so that rest of ftrace and kprobe selftests
> > can be run.
>
> This looks good to me, but could you try to find the functions
> which should be blocked from kprobes?
> (Usually, the function which are involved in the sw-breakpoint
> handling, including locks etc.)
Ah, OK.
I wonder why CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE=n doesn't help, it
was ignored if the arch doesn't support CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
Naveen, could you try to run this test case with following patch
on powerpc?
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index b911e9f6d9f5..241a55313476 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int disable_trace_kprobe(struct trace_event_call
*call,
return 0;
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) && \
+#if defined(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER) && \
!defined(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE)
static bool __within_notrace_func(unsigned long addr)
{
Of course you need to enable CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=y, but it may
pass the test.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
