On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Basically MSG_MORE is a simplified probability distribution of the next
> SEND, and it already covers all the other (iovec, nagle, TCP_CORK)
> mechanizm available, in a surprisingly easy way IMO. I believe MSG_MORE is
> very robust from a theoreticaly point of view.
Yeah, and how are you going to teach a perl CGI script that writes to
stdout to use it?
Face it, it's limited. It has, in fact, many of the same limitations
TCP_NOPUSH has.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Andi Kleen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sex... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all tha... Andi Kleen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all tha... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sex... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all tha... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Dan Kegel
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Cacophonix

